[Bug 225732] Merge Review: epiphany

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: epiphany


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225732





------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com  2007-11-14 23:33 EST -------
rpmlint output:

[mclasen at localhost devel]$ rpmlint i386/epiphany-
epiphany-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm
epiphany-debuginfo-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm
epiphany-devel-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm
[mclasen at localhost devel]$ rpmlint i386/epiphany-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm 
epiphany.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/epiphany-fonts.schemas
epiphany.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/epiphany-lockdown.schemas
epiphany.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/epiphany-pango.schemas
epiphany.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/epiphany.schemas

This is common practise, waived

epiphany.i386: W: invalid-license GFDL+

This should be GFDL, I think


[mclasen at localhost devel]$ rpmlint i386/epiphany-devel-2.20.1-4.fc9.i386.rpm 
epiphany-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
epiphany-devel.i386: W: invalid-license GFDL+

Ditto

package name: ok
spec name: ok
packaging guidelines:
 - description should be capitalized
 - mixture of rm and %{__rm}
 - -devel should require gtk-doc and pygtk2-devel for directory ownership 
license: ok
license field: see above
license file: ok
spec file language: ok
spec file readable: yes
upstream sources: ok
buildable: yes
excludearch: n/a
buildrequires: ok
locale handling: ok
shared libs: n/a
relocatable: n/a
directory ownership: see above
%files: ok
permissions: ok
%clean: ok
consistent macro use: see above
permissible content: ok
large docs: n/a
%doc content: ok
headers: ok
static libs: n/a
pc files: ok
shared libs: n/a
devel package: ok
libtool archives: ok
gui app: ok
directory ownership: see above
%install: ok
utf8 filenames: ok







-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.