[Bug 247699] Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 19 00:46:15 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: R-BufferedMatrixMethods - Microarray Data related methods that utlize BufferedMatrix
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-11-18 19:46 EST -------
Now, to this ticket:
Builds fine and has only the two expected rpmlint complaints. There are a few
minor issues with the dependencies:
You don't need the explicit Requires: R; rpm will dinf the libR.so dependency
You don't need a build dependency on R-BufferedMatrix because
R-BufferedMatrix-devel will bring it in anyway.
You should normally have a build depencency on R-devel, although it's not an
absolute requirement as this package manages to build without it.
Normally you'd have a dependency on tetex-latex. I thought it was required to
build the documentation and the %check section will warn about not finding it,
but I can't see any substantive difference between builds with and without it,
so I guess there's no need for it.
None of these are blockers.
* source files match upstream:
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has only the usual complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
R-BufferedMatrixMethods = 1.0.0-5.fc9
* %check is present and all tests pass.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (R index generation)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review