[Bug 361701] Package review: konserve

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 21 01:17:36 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Package review: konserve


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701





------- Additional Comments From andy.southgate at mushware.com  2007-11-20 20:17 EST -------
This is a pre-review as part of my own quest for sponsorship, so feel free to 
ignore it.  Points are:

o  I've dug your .spec file out of the SRPM, but it's handy to have it 
available for separate download.

o  Your source RPM doesn't rebuild using mock ( mock 
konserve-0.10.3-1.fc8.src.rpm ).  It attempts to re-run autoconf, which isn't 
listed as a BuildRequires.  Might be a timestamp problem or a side effect of 
the perl processing of configure.

o  rpmlint konserve-0.10.3-1.fc8.src.rpm
konserve.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 54, tab: line 1)

o  rpmlint konserve-0.10.3-1.fc7.i386.rpm
konserve.i386: W: 
dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konserve/common ../common
Looks like a problem in the HTML_DIR processing creating a symlink to symlink

o  Your source lists specifies the Kent mirror.  What about 
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/konserve/konserve-0.10.3.tar.gz instead?

o  Might as well use the %post and %postun from 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets.  No need to call 
gtk-update-icon-cache for locolor.

o  Supply a vendor for the .desktop file, e.g. fedora.

o  There's lots of weirdness in the installed .desktop file.

o  Description: accidently instead of incidently?

o  Consider keeping timestamps, e.g. make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} 
INSTALL="install -p" CPPROG="cp -p" install

Apart from that, this package does build, install and run.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list