[Bug 387261] Review Request: libcmpiutil - Utility library for CIM providers

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libcmpiutil - Utility library for CIM providers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387261


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-11-21 06:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Mamoru, you are right we didn't yet made a formal release of libcmpiutil,
> but I think there is nothing preventing it at this point.

Yes, I just wanted to confirm.

For 1.0-4:

* Permission of the files in srpm
  - misc issue, however please change the permission of
    the tarball and spec file in srpm to 0644.

* configure option
  - Please check if this configure accepts --disable-static
    option.

* Groups
  - Usually the rpm of "libfoo" has "System Environment/Libraries"
    group for main package and "Development/Libraries" for
    -devel package.

* timestamps
  - Please add 'INSTALL="install -p"' option to 'make install'
    to keep timestamps on installed files.
    While sometimes this does not work, this method usually works
    for recent Makefiles (and for this package).

* %defattr
  - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-)

* Documentation
  - Please add COPYING

And as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket:
-------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Before being sponsored:

This package will be accepted with another few work. 
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) 
must sponsor you.

Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other 
submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. 
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) 
are required to "show that you have an understanding 
of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
on :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
   (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
   a formal review)

When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other 
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report 
so that I can check your comments or review request.

Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to
review can be checked on:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
(NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review")


Review guidelines are described mainly on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets
------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.