[Bug 398261] Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for the Redet tool

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for the Redet tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398261





------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com  2007-11-25 08:04 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)

> There is no explicit license for the manual (as far as I can
> tell), so I guess that GPLv2 like for redet is the best choice
> for the license?

Upstream re-released the 8.23 tarball. Redet is now GPLv3, and upstream thinks
that the manual should be GPLv3 as well.

> I would also suggest dropping the dependency on redet. One
> may want to browse the documentation without having redet 
> installed.

Most -doc packages (python-docs, bouml-doc) have the parent packages as a
dependency.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.