[Bug 398781] Review Request: gfs-complutum-fonts - GFS Complutum Greek font

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 26 13:11:51 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gfs-complutum-fonts - GFS Complutum Greek font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398781





------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net  2007-11-26 08:11 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> correct  SRPM I guess is
> http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-complutum-fonts-20070413-2.fc9.src.rpm
> 
> Also, rpmlint reports
> 
> gfs-complutum-fonts.noarch: E: description-line-too-long time were the reasons
> that Otter Greek was destined to oblivion, as a curiosity.
> Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding
> this number, cut it to fit in two lines.

The lines have been resized using the standard "fold" tool. So they are all 80
column max. rpmlint targets a non-standard terminal width, 79 column and I don't
believe this width is actually in use anywhere or that any terminal user will
actually be inconvenienced if we use the full 80 column. If you really insist I
may resize the text but that seems a waste of time to me.

> gfs-complutum-fonts.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
> The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the
> version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it.

rpmlint wants to force you to put the version at the end of the first changelog
line, however the official approved Fedora changelog format list includes a
style where the version is not on this line
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs, 3rd style) so
rpmlint's warning is bogus



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list