[Bug 396731] Review Request: powerpc-utils - Utilities for PowerPC platforms

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 27 21:45:00 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: powerpc-utils - Utilities for PowerPC platforms


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396731


jwboyer at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com  2007-11-27 16:44 EST -------
 - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
 - Spec file matches base package name.
 - Spec has consistant macro usage.
 - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
 - License
 - License field in spec matches
 - License file included in package
 - Spec in American English
 - Spec is legible.
 - Sources match upstream md5sum: 33de4697b9dc36be070ae67d545fd4fe

 - BuildRequires correct
 - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
 - Package has a correct %clean section.
 - Package has correct buildroot
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 - Package is code or permissible content.
 - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

 - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
 - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
 - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
 - Package owns all the directories it creates.
 - No rpmlint output.

SHOULD Items:

 - Should build in mock.
 - Should build on all supported archs
 - Should function as described.
 - Should have sane scriptlets.
 - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
 - Should have dist tag
 - Should package latest version

Approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list