[Bug 326841] New: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used by kcbench
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 10 19:24:04 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326841
Summary: Review Request: kcbench-data - Kernel sources to be used
by kcbench
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fedora at leemhuis.info
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com
Spec URL:
http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SPECS.fdr/kcbench-data.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/kcbench-data-0.1-1.src.rpm
Description:
Linux Kernel sources to be compiled by kcbench to benchmark system
performance or test system stability.
Notes:
* I plan to ship each firth linux version (2.6.{20,25,30,35,...}) -- that should be enough afaics. Everytime I do a update users of old versions will have to update the datafiles, even if nothing changed. This you be prevented by putting kcbench-data-2.6.{20,25,30,35,...} packages into the repo -- but I don't think that's worth the trouble, as a update should happen only once a year.
* I chose to not install the datafiles in /usr/src as they might clash with other stuff there
* rpmlint puts out lots of warnings a like "devel-file-in-non-devel-package" "version-control-internal-file" "non-executable-script" -- I think they can be ignored for the purpose of this package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list