[Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 12 10:42:31 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer
Alias: px-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801
------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-10-12 06:42 EST -------
Josef -- you still didn't fix some of what did I mention in comment #3, namely:
(In reply to comment #3)
> * Source: %{name}.tar.gz -- it would be great if the source code tarball name
> contained the version. Even better if it you made it available for download
> somewhere in Internet (people.redhat.com?)
As far as I know you are the upstream of the package -- it shouldn't be hard for
you to do the change.
> * Prefix: %{_datadir}/px -- please note that making relocatable packages is
> discouraged. See paragraph "Relocatable packages" in the Guidelines [1]
Either clarify why do you need a relocatable package or remove this.
> * The changelog time stamp lines should end with complete version-release pair,
> e.g. 0-1, 0-2, 0-3 in your case. Each changelog entry should correspond to a
> revision.
Your package's version is 0, not 0.0. It would be great if you chose some sane
versioning scheme and mentioned the version in the source tarball name. I see
you changed the tarball without changing name -- please never do that.
Apart from that I found another problem:
33 %files
...
38 %{prefix}
Please don't do this -- enumerate just the files and directories your package
creates and owns. You can even use wildcards.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list