[Bug 239247] Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 23 03:25:46 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-ebib - BibTeX database manage for Emacsen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239247
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-10-22 23:25 EST -------
Might as well try to deal with any other pending emacs packages. Which is just this one, I think.
Some interesting bits:
This:
head -28 ~/tmp/ebib-1.3.1/ebib.el | sed 's/;;//g' > COPYING
has about zero chance of working.
rpmlint says:
emacs-common-ebib.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/emacs-common-ebib-1.3.1/COPYING
Fallout from the above.
emacs-common-ebib.noarch: E: description-line-too-long modifying entries),
searched, and saved. Obviously, it is also possible to start
This goes to exactly 80 characters; might be nice to wrap at 72. I don't know what rpmlint will allow before complaining.
emacs-common-ebib.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office
emacs-ebib.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office
emacs-ebib-el.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office
xemacs-ebib.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office
xemacs-ebib-el.noarch: W: non-standard-group Applications/Office
Group is irrelevant these days.
emacs-ebib.noarch: W: no-documentation
emacs-ebib-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
xemacs-ebib.noarch: W: no-documentation
xemacs-ebib-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
These are OK.
I know there's a bunch of stuff in the emacs packaging guidelines that isn't in this package. Things like the versioned dependencies on emacs(bin) and xemacs(bin) and the pkgconfig calls to extract that info. Over time I've lost any emacs expertise I ever had, but the guidelines do have a reasonable explanation of why those dependencies are necessary. But I guess you should know better than most. Are they needed in this package?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list