[Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Sep 2 10:46:32 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mindi


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317





------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de  2007-09-02 06:46 EST -------
New packages at
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/mindi-1.2.4-1.fc7.src.rpm
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm

and
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/mindi-1.2.4-1.fc6.src.rpm
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-3.fc6.src.rpm

Working yum repo at
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/fedora-mondo.repo
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/fedora-mondo.repo

Is there still someone looking for this? I'd love to see this in the standard
repository.

Bruno, could you give some more information what makes it difficult to use the
busybox package that's already in the repository? What specific additions or
fixes did you add that can't go in the main branch? I'm just curious here and
trying to build a bridge...

Where are the source packages for afio and buffer? Wouldn't these be needed as
well in Fedora and thus should also go through review? Could neither find
.src.rpm nor review request.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list