[Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: safekeep -  simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553





------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com  2007-09-08 19:19 EST -------
Okay, updated urls for the spec and srpm being submitted for review. Essentially
the same as Dimi's upstream spec from comment 15.

Spec:
http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/safekeep.spec
SRPM:
http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/safekeep-1.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm
F-7 noarch RPMS:
http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/F7/

All remaining rpmlint errors are the result of using the /var/lib/safekeep
directory as the home directory for the safekeep user and including a .ssh
sub-directory for ssh keys. As previously discussed in earlier comments, these
errors are erroneous for this atypical but appropriate usage of
/var/lib/safekeep as a home directory. 

The client package is still essentially a metapackage due to the difference in
the server and client dependency chain.  Though as upstream has mentioned, there
 are plans to add additional client package payload so keeping it as a separate
sub-package package now keeps from having to complicate things later as more
client-side development is added.

-jef

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.