[Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 11 08:02:57 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos -  olpc-related icons and pictures


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-09-11 04:02 EST -------
For redhat-logos, the latest version I found that was in redhat 8 
(no redhat 9 on rpmbones), it was redhat-logos-1.1.6. Maybe 
obsoleting < 1.2.0 could be right and then providing 1.2.0. 
So I'll propose:

Obsoletes: redhat-logos < 1.2.0
Provides: redhat-logos = 1.2.0

Unversionned obsolete is always bad since it prevents others
to provide a package with the same name (here there is a trademark
issue, though, but still it would be better).

What about my comment:
* Maybe the version should be set to 6.0.98 to match the fedora-logos
  version. Otherwise it cannot be installed along with a recent 
  redhat-artwork.

Are you sure that 
Conflicts: kdebase <= 3.1.5
Conflicts: anaconda-images <= 10
Conflicts: redhat-artwork <= 5.0.5
is right? I checked on rpmbones that none of them had the
file which is also in that package. So in my opinion removing
those obsoletes would be cleaner.


All the other rpmlint issues seem ok to me.


Regarding the license, I am a bit unsure about it. is it
really 'All rights reserved.'? Does it mean that it cannot
be redistributed at all? Is it really a restrictive license, or
is there only a trademark?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list