[Bug 292331] Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331


bugs.michael at gmx.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |bugs.michael at gmx.net
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2007-09-17 16:01 EST -------
Typo in the "amb-plugins" Provides:

$ rpm -qp --provides /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/ladspa-amb-plugins-0.3.0-1.fc8.i386.rpm
amb-plugins = 0.3.0=1.fc8
ambisonic1.so  
ambisonic2.so  
ladspa-amb-plugins = 0.3.0-1.fc8


Suggesting you replace 'I use' with 'to use' in the %description


With the Provides in the Obsoletes/Provides pair you practically
occupy the "amb-plugins" namespace. Is this really necessary
to keep both package names when this is a new-entry in Fedora?


Else it's approved packaging- and licencing-wise.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.