[Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 21 05:36:58 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: nkf


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-09-21 01:36 EST -------
yes source URL working fine. looks I got some problem. its working fine.
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
1851260a2719629294740783c14ca3d5  nkf-2.0.8b.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ Pacakge nkf-2.0.8b-1.fc8 ->
  Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) rtld(GNU_HASH)
  Package perl-NKF-2.0.8b-1.fc8 ->
  Provides: NKF.so perl(NKF) = 2.08
  Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter)
perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ Not a GUI app.
APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list