[Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 27 20:10:48 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-09-27 16:10 EST -------
Oops.  Let's try that again:

emacs-bbdb.src: W: spelling-error-in-description recieved received
  Funny rpmlint, but correct.

emacs-bbdb.src: W: invalid-license GPL
  The license needs some adjusting to meet the current guidelines.  I believe 
  the proper tag for this package is "GPLv2+" according to the comment block at 
  the head of bbdb.el

emacs-bbdb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/bbdb.info.gz
emacs-bbdb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/ChangeLog
  A quick call to iconv should fix these up.

emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-cid.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl5"
emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-unlazy-lock.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl"
emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-srv.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl"
  Even though these are packaged as documentation, it would still be nice if 
  these were fixed up with some quick calls to sed.

emacs-bbdb-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
  This is OK.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list