[Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 27 20:10:48 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 16:10 EST -------
Oops. Let's try that again:
emacs-bbdb.src: W: spelling-error-in-description recieved received
Funny rpmlint, but correct.
emacs-bbdb.src: W: invalid-license GPL
The license needs some adjusting to meet the current guidelines. I believe
the proper tag for this package is "GPLv2+" according to the comment block at
the head of bbdb.el
emacs-bbdb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/bbdb.info.gz
emacs-bbdb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/ChangeLog
A quick call to iconv should fix these up.
emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-cid.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl5"
emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-unlazy-lock.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl"
emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-srv.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl"
Even though these are packaged as documentation, it would still be nice if
these were fixed up with some quick calls to sed.
emacs-bbdb-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
This is OK.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list