[Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Sep 30 07:56:12 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 03:56 EST -------
Just a initial comment (I have not rebuilt your srpm)
* First of all,
now 0.9 seems released already so please update this.
* For license:
Current valid list for Fedora in written on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
Also please refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines
- In short
For GPL, now Fedora requests that you must specify the version
(either GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+ or "with exceptions")
* Timestamp
- For "cp" or "install", please use "-p" option to keep timestamp.
* symlink library
- Please check is symlinks *.so (not *.so.X or *.so.X.Y) are
really needed.
* Directory ownership
- The directory %{_docdir}/%{name}/ itself should also be owned
by this package.
- And usually this should be %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}.
But when you want to change documents directory, you may also
have to modify source codes, too
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list