[Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Sep 30 07:56:12 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qtiplot -  Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-09-30 03:56 EST -------
Just a initial comment (I have not rebuilt your srpm)

* First of all,
  now 0.9 seems released already so please update this.

* For license:
  Current valid list for Fedora in written on
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
  Also please refer to
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines
  - In short
    For GPL, now Fedora requests that you must specify the version
    (either GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+ or "with exceptions")

* Timestamp
  - For "cp" or "install", please use "-p" option to keep timestamp.

* symlink library
  - Please check is symlinks *.so (not *.so.X or *.so.X.Y) are
    really needed.

* Directory ownership
  - The directory %{_docdir}/%{name}/ itself should also be owned
    by this package.
  - And usually this should be %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}.
    But when you want to change documents directory, you may also
    have to modify source codes, too

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list