[Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 2 15:27:19 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 -  Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829





------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com  2008-04-02 11:27 EST -------
There are a few unversioned porvides/obseletes:
tomcat6.src:129: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp
tomcat6.src:130: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp21
tomcat6.src:155: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes servletapi6
tomcat6.src:156: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servletapi6
tomcat6.src:157: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet
tomcat6.src:158: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet6
tomcat6.src:159: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet25

license should be ASL 2.0, and rpmlint will stop complaining

coreutils doesn't need to be listed as BuildRequires.

Shouldn't the content in the docs-webapp package be marked as %doc?

in tomcat6-6.0.wrapper, /usr/share/java-utils/java-functions is sourced without
a check if it exists.

With regards to the issues that you mentioned earlier:
- use of /srv - this is fixed, right?
- initscript does not use standard start/stop functions (e.g., `daemon') - what
was the reason that we do not use the standard start/stop functions?
- upstream shell scripts do not find Java according to JPackage standard - are
these fixed?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list