[Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 4 22:27:23 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 18:27 EST -------
I noticed something that looks like a test suite; it is possible to run it at
build time?
The package seems to be missing a versioned dependency on java as required by
the guidelines.
* source files match upstream:
59fa7e74646ef4767a6d55356c580d5f24d1392ef89fbd0c435c6426353aaf7c
stringtemplate-3.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
X license text in tarball but not included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
X rpmlint has valid complaints.
X final provides and requires not quite correct:
stringtemplate = 3.1-1.fc9
=
jpackage-utils
(no java dependency)
? %check is not present, but there seems to be a test suite upstream. I've no
idea how to run it, though.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
Java-specific bits:
* no pre-built jars
* single jar, named after the package
* jarfiles are under _javadir.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list