[Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Apr 5 02:04:11 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 22:04 EST -------
Not much to this, it seems.
I guess the package.xml file is the only place to find the license; the code
itself carries no license info.
* source files match upstream:
f138f70a4ab984c3d5d2087f475bb444f78f68cb950de02756073cc92b5fc700
3_01.txt
96b8d6df0aaea17d68997b637027793517be3bbbdce632ba12f8f283aab64020
StubManager-1.2.0.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
mediawiki-StubManager = 1.2.0-1.fc9
=
mediawiki >= 1.10
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I'm not sure how you would go
about testing this, anyway.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED
Ping me when this is in rawhide and I'll review mediawiki-HNP.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list