[Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Apr 5 03:55:50 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |182235
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-04-04 23:55 EST -------
Finally have some time.

This builds OK; rpmlint says:
  php-pear-propel_runtime.src:106: W: macro-in-%changelog buildroot
You need to double percent signs in your changelog so that they aren't expanded.
  php-pear-propel_runtime.noarch: W: no-documentation
which is true; there doesn't seem to be any documentation at all in the tarball.

The license is a bit odd.  First off, I think it's LGPLv2+, because the version
is not specified anywhere and the LGPL allows us to choose any version at all in
that case.

However, if you look upstream, they say that they've relicensed Apache 2
licenced code to LGPL.  I sort of understand what the situation would be if they
had licensed to GPL, as only GPLv3 is compatible with ASLv2 so the result would
be GPLv3+.  But I really don't know about LGPL.

Honestly seeing that they've just decided to relicense others code to an
incompatible license makes me rather nervous. Blocking legal for input on the
license compatibility, and someone should really check with upstream about what
version of the LGPL they actually intend.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list