[Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 10 18:21:38 UTC 2008

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua


michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com  2008-04-10 14:21 EST -------
• rpmlint: OK
• package name: OK
• spec file name: OK
• package guideline-compliant: OK
• license complies with guidelines: OK
• license field accurate: OK
• license file not deleted: OK
• spec in US English: OK
• spec legible: OK
• source matches upstream: OK
• builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: noarch
• build dependencies complete: OK
• locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: N/A
• library -> ldconfig: N/A
• relocatable: give reason: N/A
• own all directories: See note below
• no dupes in %files: OK
• permission: OK
• macros used consistently: OK
• Package contains code: OK
• large docs => -doc: N/A
• clean buildroot before install: OK
• filenames UTF-8: OK

• package build in mock on all architectures: OK
• package functioned as described: OK
• scriplets are sane: OK
• require package not files: OK

Note: both luadoc and lua-logging requires lua >= 5.1, but install files under
%{_datadir}/lua/5.1 . Perhaps make them also require lua < 5.2 ? Otherwise
things will break when lua 5.2 is released: users might end up with dangling
/usr/share/lua/5.1 directories


Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

More information about the package-review mailing list