[Bug 441086] Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 11 05:39:30 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-11 01:39 EST -------
Sorry, I ended up running out of time for a bit there.
Some of the source is MIT licensed, some is GPLv2+ and some is GPLv2. That does
make the result plain GPLv2.
The obvious question is whether this decodes MP3 in any way, and as far as I can
tell it doesn't, other than parsing the metadata. It can use external programs
to transcode things to and from MP3 but it doesn't include those programs.
* source files match upstream:
5f279eab49b6d71441358ef046fdbd3749396cf43818e436239fdb3e004e4ecb
ezstream-0.5.3.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
ezstream = 0.5.3-1.fc9
=
libogg.so.0()(64bit)
libshout.so.3()(64bit)
libspeex.so.1()(64bit)
libtag_c.so.0()(64bit)
libtheora.so.0()(64bit)
libvorbis.so.0()(64bit)
libvorbisfile.so.3()(64bit)
libxml2.so.2()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I don't really have any idea
how to test this.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list