[Bug 442057] Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442057


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-04-11 11:43 EST -------
This builds OK (although the output is crazy verbose); rpmlint says:

  mono-nunit22.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT with acknowledgement
rpmlint is a bit behind here.

  mono-nunit22.x86_64: E: no-binary
  mono-nunit22.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
These are normal for mono packages.

  mono-nunit22-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
Indeed, the debuginfo package seems to be completely empty.  Probably best to
disable it.

  mono-nunit22-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
That's OK; it's just a .pc file.

I'm going to trust your evaluation of the license so that I don't have to open
a damn rtf viewer.  The world is just full of idiocy, it seems.

So the only issue is the empty debuginfo package; I'll approve this and you
can disable it when you check in.

* source files match upstream:
   181ed056855cb8490d3ef5d0763d7a7a90c44402b7dcbb4a3341f80dbb75b9d4  
   NUnit-2.2.10-src.zip
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
X debuginfo package is busted.
X rpmlint has a valid complaint about the debuginfo package.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  mono-nunit22-2.2.10-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
   mono(nunit-console) = 0.0.0.0
   mono(nunit-console-runner) = 2.2.10.0
   mono(nunit.core) = 2.2.10.0
   mono(nunit.core.extensions) = 2.2.10.0
   mono(nunit.framework) = 2.2.10.0
   mono(nunit.mocks) = 2.2.10.0
   mono(nunit.util) = 2.2.10.0
   mono-nunit22 = 2.2.10-1.fc9
  =
   mono(System) = 2.0.0.0
   mono(System.Xml) = 2.0.0.0
   mono(mscorlib) = 2.0.0.0
   mono(nunit-console-runner) = 2.2.10.0
   mono(nunit.core) = 2.2.10.0
   mono(nunit.framework) = 2.2.10.0
   mono(nunit.util) = 2.2.10.0

  mono-nunit22-devel-2.2.10-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
   mono-nunit22-devel = 2.2.10-1.fc9
  =
   mono-nunit22 = 2.2.10-1.fc9
   pkgconfig

* %check is not present.  I there are tests, but they're run at build time.
  At least that's what it looks like the build-tests targets are doing.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* pkgconfig file is (alone) in the -devel package.

APPROVED; just disable the debuginfo package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.