[Bug 442640] New: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Apr 15 23:23:11 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442640

           Summary: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epeg-goes-rawhide/epeg.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epeg-goes-rawhide/epeg-0.9.1.042-1.fc9.src.rpm
RPMs for i386 and x86_64 built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epeg-goes-rawhide/

Description:
Epeg is insanely fast at loading large JPEG images and scaling them down to
tiny thumbnails. It's speedup will be proportional to the size difference
between the source image and the output thumbnail size as a count of their
pixels.

It makes use of libjpeg features of being able to load an image by only
decoding the DCT coefficients needed to reconstruct an image of the size
desired. This gives a massive speedup. If you do not try and access the pixels
in a format other than YUV (or GRAY8 if the source is grascale) then it also
avoids colorspace conversions as well.


RPMLint spits out only W: no-documentation on -devel package because there's no documentation in upstream package. Epeg mostly helper library for higher-lever thumbnailing API - epsilon.
Package works as expected - makes thumbnails of jpegs faster than imagemagick ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list