[Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mpich2 -  An implementation of MPI


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993





------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com  2008-04-16 19:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #71)

> 
> Well, that wasn't really my point. My question was, assuming you have
> mvapich/mvapich2 available in fedora, then do we need mpich/mpich2?  Is there
> any compelling reason for it?

I've just browse through its source and notice mvapich2 really seems to be a
superset of mpich2, but I'm not so sure how much it support the commodity tcp/ip
stack. I guess if we have mvapich2, mpich2 wouldn't be so necessary then; only
that mvapich2 release will always be lagging behind mpich2's. The current
mvapich2-1.0.2p1 ships with mpich2-1.0.5p4, while the latest upstream is at
mpich2-1.0.7 .

>  (Not that I object if you want to do the work,
> just asking)



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.