[Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 17 14:51:25 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883
overholt at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com
AssignedTo|overholt at redhat.com |fedora at matbooth.co.uk
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co
| |m)
------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-17 10:51 EST -------
Nice job, Mat! A very clean package. Here's my review. Everything's good to
go pending spot's legal approval of the fetching (see the last question below,
spot). Assuming that is given the go-ahead, this package is APPROVED.
MUST items that either have comments or need looking into:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
* verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do)
- the tarball I created using your script didn't have the same md5sum as
yours, but a recursive diff of the exploded tarball resulted in no
differences so I'll assume it's a timestamp thing
? specfile is legible
- two grammar nit-picks (feel free to ignore my pedantry if you wish ;) :
"URL based" -> "URL-based"
"java" -> "Java"
Questions:
- does upstream not provide any build mechanism?
- have you considered offering upstream your build.xml?
- your signal-handling patch doesn't affect runtime, right?
- is the script for fetching the source acceptable to Fedora "legal" (CCing
spot)? To download myself I had to click through to accept the SPL.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list