[Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Apr 20 11:09:14 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scidavis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973
------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-04-20 07:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > > 2.) Duplicate files
> > >
> > > warning:
> > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so
> > > warning:
> > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1
> > > warning:
> > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0
> > > warning:
> > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0
> > > warning:
> > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so
> > > warning:
> > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1
> > > warning:
> > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0
> > > warning: File listed twice:
/usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0
> > > warning:
> > > File listed twice:
> > > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/mimetypes/application-x-scidavis.svg
> >
> > I can't reproduce this
>
> I am wondering if this is x86_64 specific? Could you please attach your build log?
see attached file
>
> > > 4.) Just rm or %exclude .pyc and .pyo (unless they are needed)
> > >
> > > rpmlint of scidavis:
> > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyc
> > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyo
> > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.py
> >
> > These files are needed see comment 1 about this.
>
> Even the .pyo and .pyc? I highly doubt that -- have you tried excluding them?
You are right. Now i drop their.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list