[Bug 457123] Review Request: pyevent - Python bindings for libevent

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Aug 4 05:46:10 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457123


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com




--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-08-04 01:46:09 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock.
 Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756467
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
584912c92d08bf005283fb29a47a6e4d  pyevent-0.3.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ Not a GUI app.
+ Package pyevent-0.3-3.fc10 =>
  Provides: event.so
  Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libevent-1.4.so.2 libpthread.so.0
libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH)

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list