[Bug 457924] New: Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924

           Summary: Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library
                    for embedding a webserver in applications
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/libmicrohttpd.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm

Description:

This is a library which can be used to embed a webserver in applications. I'm
about to use it for one of my applications which is already available in Fedora
(NNTPGrab).

The package consists of 3 sub-packages:
libmicrohttpd: the library itself
libmicrohttpd-devel: development files
libmicrohttpd-doc: API documentation and example source code

During compilation, the testsuite bundled with the library is also run

$ rpmlint libmicrohttpd.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint libmicrohttpd-*
libmicrohttpd.i386: W: no-documentation
libmicrohttpd-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
libmicrohttpd-doc.i386: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/libmicrohttpd-doc-0.3.1/html/d8/d26/microhttpd_8h__incl.map
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

The 2 no-documentation warnings are false positives, all the docs are bundled
in the -doc subpackage.
The zero-length file is something which is auto-generated by doxygen..I don't
know whether to leave it as is or remove the file manually.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.