[Bug 455500] Review Request: OpenGTL -- graphics transformation languages (used by krita2)
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 7 18:54:00 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
--- Comment #11 from Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net> 2008-08-07 14:53:59 EDT ---
> We can get the review rolling with a pre-review, even before you organize the
I have an account, but the CLA may need to go through my company's legal
dept... otherwise so far I haven't done anything but create it.
> And you should be referring to the process in:
> so please post the .spec and .src.rpm somewhere on the web, and explicitly
provide the links in this bug,
The .spec is already here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729
I don't have anywhere to put the SRPM (and/or haven't figured out / set up
FAS), but it's easily created:
cd ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES ; wget
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS ; wget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS ; rpmbuild -bs OpenGTL.spec
(in appropriate directories, of course)
Or, is 163k small enough to just dump the SRPM in here as an attachment, also?
> in the requested format, ie with description,
and rpmlint status.
D'oh! Sorry about that! Trying again...
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ echo *
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ rpmlint *
OpenGTL-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
OpenGTL-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
~/rpmbuild/SRPMS$ rpmlint OpenGTL-0.9.4-1.fc9.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
I'm not sure if the no-documentation warning is interesting? Should I just copy
the same doc to -devel, -libs? Or is there a "normal" way to handle this I'm
not familiar with?
Other than the above warnings, I've tried to follow the specs as close as
possible (and as far as I can tell, I'm ok w.r.t. the ReviewGuidelines
checklist), but as you know this is still my first package, so I'm still
feeling my way around :-).
Note: I can't conveniently test with mock right now as I'm on x86_64 (see
blocking bug 455502). I'm building locally with a fixed llvm package from
Cyrille Berger. When I get time, I'll test it on my other (i686) machine that
should build with the current rawhide llvm package.
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review