[Bug 458220] Review Request: php-pecl-json - PECL library to implement JSON in PHP

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 7 21:44:20 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458220





--- Comment #1 from S.A. Hartsuiker <sahartsu at xs4all.nl>  2008-08-07 17:44:18 EDT ---
RPM Lint: 1 error, see to the bottom of this comment
Package name: php-pecl-json
Spec file: php-pecl-json.spec
License: PHP
Actual License: PHP v3.01
%doc License: not included
Spec file language: english
Spec file readable: yes
Upstream source vs. used tarball: md5sums match
Compile and Build:
 - F-8: n/a
 - F-9: n/a
 - rawhide: n/a
 - EL-5: builds

Applicable Package Guidelines: ok

Locales: not aplicable
Shared libs: ok

Relocatable: no
Directory and file ownership: ok
No duplicate files in %files: ok
File Permissions: ok
Macro usage: not ok, see bottom
Code vs. Content: ok
(Large) Documentation: ok
%doc affecting runtime: ok
Header files in -devel package: n/a
Static Libraries in -static package: n/a
pkgconfig Requires: n/a
Library files: ok
Devel requires base package: n/a
.la libtool archives: n/a
Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok
Remove BuildRoot: ok
UTF-8 filenames: ok

rpmlint complains about:
[shartsuiker at localhost json-1.2.1]$ rpmlint -i -v
/var/lib/mock//epel-5-i386/result/php-pecl-json-1.2.1-1.el5.i386.rpm 
php-pecl-json.i386: I: checking
php-pecl-json.i386: E: percent-in-dependency php-zend-abi %{php_zendabiver}
This rpm has a dependency whose version part contains the '%' character. It
could be an unexpanded macro, please double check.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

All I did was a mock build against epel-5-i386 on fedora9 . Looks like the
dependencies are not working properly.
Does this have to be build on a rhel5 box?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list