[Bug 458248] Review Request: ibus-m17n - m17n engine for IBus

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 8 05:59:05 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458248


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-08-08 01:59:04 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=765917
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
5d40778080e012f7fcf25342d0b21966  ibus-m17n-0.1.0.20080709.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Package ibus-m17n-0.1.0.20080709-1.fc10 =>
  Provides: _m17n.so
  Requires: /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm17n-core.so.0
 libm17n.so.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH)

 APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list