[Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 14 23:13:59 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177





--- Comment #2 from Luke Macken <lmacken at redhat.com>  2008-08-14 19:13:58 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> rpmlint complains that the license is unknown. The spec defines it as PSF or
> ZPL.
> 
> The possiblilities for ZPL are:  ZPLv1.0, ZPLv1.0+, ZPLv2.0, ZPLv2.0+, ZPLv2.1,
> or ZPLv2.1+
> Is PSF the Python license?

I believe so, yes.  I'm not quite sure about what to do with the License tag,
as it says "PSF or ZPL" in the docs...

> The %doc files all have executable permissions!? (e.g.
> /usr/share/doc/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev/Indexing.txt)

Fixed.

> The changelog version doesn't match the RPM version:  1.0-1 vs 0.5a1.dev-0.2569

Fixed.

> The Source0 URL is incorrect. I found it at
> http://peak.telecommunity.com/snapshots/

Fixed.

http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-rules.spec
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list