[Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685





--- Comment #13 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou at pingoured.fr>  2008-08-18 11:20:25 EDT ---
Ok,
Sorry for the delay I have been away for few days.

> comment #8

Let me explain my though, this is my first project that I package, I have
almost never seen the spec file in the sources that I packaged and did not know
about the rpmbuild -ta.

I have always been working with src.rpm also because it is supposed to be the
base of the review and what is available with yumdownload --source.

But I understand that some people could be interested on having the specfile
with the source.

Thanks for the information.

> Comment #9
That was indeed my question I could not find you on the FAS.

> Comment #10

Thanks for the light, that was actually my question, I never faced a project
with the spec file furnished (especially because I assume that the spec file
can be rather different in OS like SuSE compare to Fedora -- just my guess I do
not know enough SuSE).

Anyway there is a new version which include the spec file into the sources for
the people who do not like src.rpm :)

http://pingoured.fr/public/R2spec/R2spec.spec
http://pingoured.fr/public/R2spec/R2spec-2.4.0.tar.gz
http://pingoured.fr/public/R2spec/R2spec-2.4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm

I corrected the python-devel and I think the tar.gz instead of tar

Fedorahosted server seems to be down at the moment but I will upload the new
version as soon as I get an access back.

Regards,
Pierre

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.