[Bug 458585] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 20 02:31:02 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458585
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2008-08-19 22:31:01 EDT ---
This looks OK; rpmlint has one complaint:
cwdaemon.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/cwdaemon-0.9.4/cwsetup.sh
Normally documentation shouldn't be executable, but it's not really a problem
as long as it doesn't cause additional dependencies. I think in this case it
causes a /bin/sh dependency which I don't really see as a problem.
You seem to be missing the %postun scriptlet; without it, the daemon will not
restart itself after a package update.
* source files match upstream:
0b26304333a1933d45814be23788295dd22fa6d80fc651a32fb12bd042b9e84e
cwdaemon-0.9.4.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
config(cwdaemon) = 0.9.4-7.fc10
cwdaemon = 0.9.4-7.fc10
cwdaemon(x86-64) = 0.9.4-7.fc10
=
/bin/bash
/bin/sh
/sbin/chkconfig
/sbin/service
config(cwdaemon) = 0.9.4-7.fc10
libcw.so.0()(64bit)
* %check is not present; no way to test this without the proper hardware.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
X scriptlets present look OK, but %postun is missing.
* initscript looks OK.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list