[Bug 460260] Review Request: pangomm - C++ wrapper for pango

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 27 14:48:42 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460260





--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-08-27 10:48:41 EDT ---
Well,

(In reply to comment #2)
> - package owns all directories it creates
>   doesn't own the following dirs that it creates:
>   %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/pangomm-1.4
>   %{_includedir}/pangomm-1.4
>   %{_includedir}/pangomm-1.4/pangomm

  - -devel subpackage actually owns these directories.
    When written as
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
%files
%{_includedir}/pangomm-%{apiver}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This contains the directory %{_includedir}/pangomm-%{apiver} and all
directories/files/etc
    under this directory.

Some notes:
  - "BuildRequires: pango-devel" is listed twice.
  - The %description of -devel subpackage is not right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This package contains the static libraries and header files needed for
                          ^^^^^^
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  - Would you consider to use
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    to keep timestamps on as many files as possible? This method usually works
for
    recent autotool based Makefiles.
  - Would you explain why you want to remove files under
%_libdir/pangomm-%apiver ?
  - %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ is already marked as docDirs (see Changelog in
"rpm" package:
    from 2007-06-29)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list