[Bug 474812] Review Request: perl-Class-Unload - unload given Class

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Dec 6 22:48:35 UTC 2008

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-12-06 17:48:33 EDT ---
rpmlint says:
  perl-Class-Unload.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized unload given Class
Easy to fix.

  perl-Class-Unload.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Unloads the given
   by clearing out its symbol table and removing it from %INC.
Just needs one carriage return.

Those are really trivial, so I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix
them when you check in.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK (needs capitalization).
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Class::Unload) = 0.05
   perl-Class-Unload = 0.05-1.fc11
   perl >= 0:5.005

* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=5, Tests=21,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr  0.01 sys +  0.09 cusr  0.02 
    csys =  0.13 CPU)

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED, just fix up Summary: and %description.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list