[Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 17 18:48:44 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org




--- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-12-17 13:48:40 EDT ---
Looks like Kevin now owns this package; updating the CC.  I never found the
time to get back to this, but I should be able to do so soon.

The rpmlint complaint list is currently:

  agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
   /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64']
  agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
   /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64']
  agg.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
   /usr/lib64/libaggfontfreetype.so.2.0.4 ['/usr/lib64']
These are new since my last comment, and need tto be fixed up.

  agg.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 
   _Z8agg_mainiPPc
  agg.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 
   _Z8agg_mainiPPc
These are OK as discussed above.

  agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency 
   /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency 
   /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6
  agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency 
   /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6
These are not a big deal as discussed above, but are easy to get rid of.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list