[Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 5 11:46:13 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817
bugzilla at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
Version|devel |rawhide
------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2008-02-05 06:46 EST -------
:-) I was about to construct package for QtCurve-0.55, and submit them to
Fedora.
Kelly, can you update to QtCurve-0.55 in bug #238816 and bug #238815, and also
provide the KDE4 style? I am using this style in both Gtk2/KDE3/Qt4 apps, and
my desktop now looks better.
In my opinion, the current meta-package should not exist. Anyway, should it
exist, then the requirements should be:
kde-style-qtcurve = %{version}, gtk-qtcurve-engine = %{version}
(In reply to comment #1)
> imo, this is is kinda pointless, but who am I to judge? :)
Rex, you are the maintainer of gtk-qt-engine. I do not understand your point,
here. In my opinion, using QtCurve for both KDE3, KDE4 and Gtk is a better
option than gtk-qt-engine, because it offers a quite-uniform look for all the
desktop, even for KDE3/KDE4. Until all KDE3 applications are ported to KDE4, I
will prefere to use QtCurve instead of a mix of Oxygen (for KDE4) and any
other style for Gtk2/KDE3/Qt3.
And, IMO, Oxygen is ugly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list