[Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 6 17:06:29 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2008-02-06 12:06 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well, actually something strange. On my *rawhide* machine,
> when I manually try "rpmbuild -ba", the compilation log says:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Processing files: libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: libdstr.so.2
> Processing files: libdstr-debuginfo-20080124-1.fc9
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> But 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [tasaka1 at localhost SPECS]$ rpm -qp --requires
> ../RPMS/i386/libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9.i386.rpm 
> libdstr = 20080124-1.fc9
> libdstr.so.2  
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> So actually libdstr-devel requires libdstr = %name-%version.
> Perhaps "rpm" side (and packages "rpm" depends on) changed somewhat?
> Anyway it seems to be working. (Maybe I have to file a bug against
> "rpm"??)

looks like that.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list