[Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 06:11:22 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-02-15 01:11 EST -------
Builds OK and rpmlint is silent.

I believe the license should be "LGPLv2 with exceptions" as the LICENCE file
describes a set of circumstances under which one of the LGPL clauses may be
avoided.  This doesn't render the software non-free or anything, but it's
still something which needs to be noted.

I need to get a ruling on the duplication of the documentation files which I've seen on some of your packages.  The review guidelines state explicitly that you should not have duplicates in your %files lists and this will usually terminate the build but for some reason duplicating %doc files doesn't.  I've asked for some guidance on the fedora-packaging list.  If I don't see anything negative about the practice by tomorrow, I'll go ahead and approve this.

* source files match upstream:
   9ef339ed4cb15f0c458d0093b90dd249d8d1dfb1b01a1fedc542e67f67a7194f  
   cryptokit-1.3.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* ocaml templates and guidelines are followed.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
X license field doesn't quite match the license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  ocaml-cryptokit-1.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
   dllcryptokit.so()(64bit)
   ocaml(Cryptokit) = 1f0f8298e13e19d726d354711a8a5f35
   ocaml-cryptokit = 1.3-1.fc9
  =
   libz.so.1()(64bit)
   ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5
   ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2
   ocaml(CamlinternalOO) = 6d0d5b328d6db88f403ca4393b4abd38
   ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1
   ocaml(Filename) = 633a1e7f590ff5e95124293dbef3b476
   ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948
   ocaml(Nat) = 0ea20dd1cc4533fd519b5542a89feb87
   ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d
   ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57
   ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab
   ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28
   ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599
   ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.0

  ocaml-cryptokit-devel-1.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
   ocaml-cryptokit-devel = 1.3-1.fc9
  =
   ocaml-cryptokit = 1.3-1.fc9

* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
? some duplicated %doc files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list