[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 29 08:21:04 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253
------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-02-29 03:21 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> For 1.0.13-4:
>
> * Source tarball
> - The tarball in your srpm does not coincide with what
> is written as %Source:
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 197993 2006-01-27 23:03 dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 200442 2008-02-23 12:58
> dotconf-1.0.13-4.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz
> ----------------------------------------------------------
I manually changed the encoding of AUTHORS and doc/dotconf-features.txt. This
was causing teh problem. I have requested to dotconf developer to make in
correct in there source file. I have also changed the encoding using iconv.
> * rpmlint
> Please check your rpms by rpmlint again?
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> dotconf.src: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf
> dotconf.src: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file
> parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration
files.
> dotconf.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dotconf-1.0.13/AUTHORS
> dotconf.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf
> dotconf.i386: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file
> parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration
files.
> dotconf.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0,13.4 1.0.13-4.fc9
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Summary:
> - Summary must begin with capital letter.
> Also, please change the Summary "dot.conf". This Summary description
> is not useful.
>
> - description-line-too-long:
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> $ rpmlint -I description-line-too-long
> description-line-too-long :
> Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding
> this number, cut it to fit in two lines.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> - AUTHORS file is not encoded with UTF-8. Please change the
> encoding to UTF-8.
>
> - The EVR (epoch-version-release) in %changelog is not right.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia<assim.deodia at gmail.com> 1.0.13-4
> - Applied patch macro
>
> * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia<assim.deodia at gmail.com> 1.0.13-3
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Also please insert one line between each %changelog entry.
> This is useful for Fedora's CVS system.
>
> Then, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket:
Done All.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> NOTE: Before being sponsored:
>
> This package will be accepted with another few work.
> But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate)
> must sponsor you.
>
> Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other
> submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally.
> For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you)
> are required to "show that you have an understanding
> of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described
> on :
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
>
> Usually there are two ways to show this.
> A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
> B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request
> (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
> a formal review)
Pre-reviewed bug number 435227.
I will review more bugs shortly.
> Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to
> review can be checked on:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/
buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone
This url is not working.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list