[Bug 438262] Review Request: beecrypt - An open source cryptography library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 8 20:53:06 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: beecrypt - An open source cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438262
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-05-08 16:53 EST -------
Reviewing...
Full review done, results:
Must Fix:
=========
* Drop the java_arches %define and %ifarch's, gcj is available on all Fedora
supported platforms now a days
* The library gets compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer in the CFLAGS, making
debugging it impossible
* The following rpmlint errors:
beecrypt-java.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libbeecrypt_java.so
beecrypt-java.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib64/libbeecrypt_java.so.0.0.0
beecrypt-java.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib64/libbeecrypt_java.so.0.0.0
What is the idea behind this .so, is this a binding for java, and shouldn't it
get installed somewhere under /usr/lib/java then?
Should Fix
==========
* Re-enable c++ bindings, the reason to disable them (not make rpm depend upon
libstdc++) is no longer valid, and I think that for other beecrypt users
beecrypt requering libstdc++ is nothing but a small nuisance.
Note if you do this you must add libicu-devel to the BuildRequires as that
is required for the c++ stuff
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list