[Bug 438043] Review Request: GMT - Generic Mapping Tools
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 12 18:11:14 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: GMT - Generic Mapping Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438043
------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-05-12 14:11 EST -------
ldconfig call should be in %post, not %pre.
There is a \ missing on the find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{gmthome}/examples -name
\*.\*sh | line
Also you could consider removing the .bat files in examples, rpmlint
says:
GMT-examples.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/GMT/examples/ex03/job03.bat
There are .in files remaining in
/usr/share/GMT/conf/.gmtdefaults_SI.in
/usr/share/GMT/conf/.gmtdefaults_US.in
/usr/share/GMT/conf/gmt.conf.in
I think they should be removed. You could also consider using the
timestamps of the .in files to have consistent timestamps across arches
for the files in /etc/GMT/
Also maybe the .gmtdefaults_SI and .gmtdefaults_US could be considered
as documentation and linked like other config files in /etc/GMT and as
%config.
Another issue revealed by rpmlint is
GMT-examples.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/GMT/examples/ex26/job26.csh
/bin/csh
Maybe the .csh files could be made non executable, and only the
sh files would be executable?
There is also
GMT-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/octave/site/api-v32/m/grdinfo.m
GMT-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/octave/site/api-v32/m/grdwrite.m
GMT-octave.i386: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/octave/site/api-v32/m/grdread.m
because these files have the execute bit set. You should correct it
if it is wrong.
A last remaining issue is the soname issue. Any comment on that?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list