[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 12 19:12:24 UTC 2008

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hylafax


------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com  2008-05-12 15:12 EST -------
(In reply to comment #81)

> I don't believe we should package /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps.  It
contains the old SGI name and logo and I'm pretty certain we shouldn't be
sticking it in /etc whenever someone installs this software.  I'm not even sure
we have the legal right to distribute it, which is reason one for blocking FE-Legal.

Indeed, this falls a little outside the realm of fair use. Please get rid of it.

> I'm going to have to get expert assistance with the License: tag; the license
given in the COPYRIGHT file is actually identical to the libtiff license, which
gets its own "libtiff" license tag, but the regex code is clearly the bad
"BSD+Advertising" clause which is GPL-incompatible and thus causes issues. 
Reason two that I'm blocking FE-Legal for guidance.

There's no incompatibility there, but please use: License: libtiff and BSD with

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the package-review mailing list