[Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 1 08:04:40 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171





--- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra at gmail.com>  2008-10-01 04:04:39 EDT ---
New package:
Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gedit-latex-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gedit-latex-plugin-0.1.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm

Licence: the code says "version 2 or or (at your option) any later version.".
See for example Logger.py or graphics/GraphicsDialog.py. What it's true is that
some files doesn't mention any license at all (GraphicsSourceBuilder.py). I
think the license is GPL2v+

The rest of the issues are fixed. rpmlint still gives two errors, but I think
they can be ignored in our case

gedit-latex-plugin.x86_64: E: no-binary
gedit-latex-plugin.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

Thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list