[Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171





--- Comment #5 from Orcan Ogetbil <orcanbahri at yahoo.com>  2008-10-01 13:00:35 EDT ---
Thanks for the update and for filing those bug reports. Please keep track of
them and update your package in the future.

The package is in pretty good shape but yet I have two issues.

1) The debuginfo guidelines at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo say that one can disable the
debuginfo package if it does not contain arch-specific files but the package
itself is not noarch because of the installation path it uses. As for now the
debuginfo package is empty and there is no need to ship it. Please disable it
and put a comment in the spec file.

2) The naming of the package kind-of bugs me. There is already a gedit-plugins
package which is the official plugins package. The website of gedit also has
links to 3rd party plugins ( http://live.gnome.org/Gedit/Plugins ) and the
LaTeX plugin is one of the 3rd party plugins.

A quick "yum search plugin" showed me there are both 
foo-plugin-bar
foo-bar-plugin
types of plugin packages in Fedora.
But since there already is a gedit-plugins package should we consider to have
this package as gedit-plugin-latex or gedit-plugin-LaTeX ; OR if you want to
keep the original name for the plugin how about gedit-LaTeXPlugin? The
documentation gives you some freedom for this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29

I leave this up to you but my vote would be for gedit-LaTeXPlugin .

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.