[Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 2 00:29:15 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432





--- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net>  2008-10-01 20:29:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
> license.
> 
> License: GPLv2+
> Should be GPLv3+. IIUC LGPLv3+ libraries can only be linked in if GPLv2+
> sources are "upgraded" to GPLv3. I'll re-check this, but I think I'm correct.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix

I'm not sure, but I think it's not linking, but distributing libxc as part of
octopus (or is that "mere aggregation"?) that affects the license. However, the
license tag could definitely stay at GPLv2+ if you package libxc separately and
only link against it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list