[Bug 463791] Review Request: compat-db45 - The Berkeley DB database compatibility library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 3 18:25:34 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463791


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tibbs at math.uh.edu




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-10-03 14:25:32 EDT ---
A couple of issues/questions:

I don't see the point in the obsoletes of ancient db versions being in this
compat package.  Honestly I don't see the point of them being in the base db
package (since we don't support upgrades from any release which would have them
and there is probably never been a Fedora release that had them) but that's a
different review ticket.  I have no idea what yum would do with an unversioned
non-provided obsolete that appears in more than one package, but it's probably
not something we want to worry about.

I can't actually install these packages since they conflict with the existing
compat-db package which is a rather essential system component.  I'm not sure
how I could actually do that without composing a new OS tree so I'm just not
going to worry about it.

What's the point of the -devel package?  I was under the impression that we
didn't want -devel packages for compat libraries, and the existing compat-db
package doesn't have one.

What happens to the /usr/bin/db45* executables and /usr/bin/berkeley_db45_svc?

After this split, what becomes of the db 4.3 stuff?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list